Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
A lesson to all of those who still tried to point out Obama's drug usage (year and years ago that he readily admitted to...more than I can say for Clinton or Bush) as a reason why he shouldn't have been elected.
Stones and glass houses.
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/crime/story/628010.html
according to the link, Bristol is due Saturday...question is....is the wedding still on....?
Hmmm...
Barack Obama was accused of "palling around with terrorists" a claim never substantiated.
Sarah Palin's family can be accused of "palling around with druggies".
...wow. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
If the roles were reversed, I wonder how much of a non issue this would be.
ETA: It's a non issue the same way Palin told us that her daughter's out of wedlock pregnancy was a non issue.
|
I hope you realize how ridiculous this whole line of posting is, or that you're just trying to get a rise out of people. Otherwise, it's a bit odd how much anger there is behind your political posting.
Also, you can't (with any credibility) opine about how much of a "non-issue" something would be when you're the one making the issue out of this.
ETA: You may want to take a page from GeekyPenguin, nittanyalum, or any number of other posters who obviously feel passionately about the issues, but who have been able to participate in reasonable political discussion.