View Single Post
  #7  
Old 11-25-2008, 01:28 AM
Tinia2 Tinia2 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
I'm not sure how much the agency relationship plays into this. In fact, I think that's a pretty weak claim as employers typically aren't liable for the intentional torts of their agents.

A bailment claim is what seems to fit best, at least if you want access to the deep pocket.

And UGA, making people pay for their wrongs isn't exactly a new thing. I guess you can continue to ignore me when I explain to you that the 3-million figure is in no way representative of what the plaintiff will probably end up with... but I guess it offends you that anyone ever has to compensate another person for a dignity tort?
$3 million is just the starting point Kevin:
"The suit seeks no less than $1 million for outrage; no less than $1 million for public disclosure of private facts; and, no less than $1 million for casting the Shermans in a false light."
PLUS damages:"The suit seeks damages to be determined by a jury for negligence and negligent supervision."
http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/20...8fzsherman.txt

However, if this is only a hoax/shakedown, wonder what will happen?
__________________
"When you have reached the end of the road, then you can decide, whether to go to the left or to the right, to fire or to water. If you make those decisions before you have even set foot upon the road, it will take you no where... except to a bad end."
Reply With Quote