Quote:
Originally posted by legacypbs
My point was that it is sanctioned by their national body. Their national body had sense enough to organize their process instead of shun it. Individuals act as if pledging does not serve a purpose. If you think it doesn't that means one of two things.
1) You didn't pledge
2) The person who was in charge of your process didn't know what they were doing.
My whole point with this discussion is Yes hazing is wrong but is MIP the right solution.
|
Who said pledging didn't serve a purpose? We've had MIP since 1990 so if people wanted to bring back a organized pledge process they have had 12 years to rally and bring it back.