Quote:
Originally Posted by nittanyalum
No, I get what you were saying, my father keeps saying something similar (in fact, he had the same reaction when I sent HIM the link this morning  ).
The implication is that Obama isn't really living up to the "change" mantra since he's bringing in some people that served in the Clinton administration. And my argument is that the "change" mandate was in reference to the past 8 years. If these people have not been in position the last 8 years, then hey, that's CHANGE! And yes, I believe in it.  |
Well, I think there could still be "change," so to speak, even if you're using people recycled from past administrations. One of the great things about using "change" as part of your platform is that it's such a broad term. No matter what he does, as long as it's somewhat different from the past, he could say he's living up to that "change" philosophy.