View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-17-2008, 12:26 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin View Post
What I think it is interesting about this discussion as a whole is that all these non-Catholics and ex-Catholics are assuming this means everyone in the Congregation who voted for Obama is just going to stay in the pews on Sundays and not take Communion.
Not all of us non-Catholics have been assuming this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dekeguy View Post
HOWEVER, if a medical procedure is necessary to save life and the intention is save the life of the mother and if as a result of the procedure the child is lost then this is a tragic happening but it is a consequence of an act to save life, not to end it. The issue revolves around the intention. Procedure intended to save life with an unintended but inevitable consequence - morally acceptable. Procedure to intentionally end life - morally unacceptable. No, its not splitting hairs. Its a tough call but a clear standard to follow.
The principle of double effect, basically? (With a nod of the head to Thomas Aquinas.)
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote