|
I am not talking about sex out of wedlock. This was clearly a casual encounter at a frat house in the bedroom. It was not even a girlfriend/boyfriend thing.
And frankly she can do as she pleases- I am just pointing out how it looks. It has nothing to do with 1953 versus 2008- it has to do with the fact most ladies do not have one night stands in fraternity houses.
I do agree that her right to privacy is totally separate from the moral argument. It is just that from a public perception standpoint she is really screwing herself over. This is not a good way to be famous when you start looking for a husband (admittedly a double standard expectation of women which I think unfortunate- but there it is.)
Edit- I also apologize for being so coarse about this. I was working late last night and not in a good mood. Also, as I am now in my 30s I am seeing a lot of ladies I know who made bad calls early in life and how it is devastating them now. It is very frustrating to watch people do something we all do from time to time and just happen to be the one who gets caught up in a bad situation. I don't hate this young lady. I just think the lawsuit is bad decision #2 and makes the perfectly normal bad decision #1 into something that is even worse- i.e. suggesting she is a gold digger. Saying whore on an internet forum doesn't exactly help the situation, but it was my gut reaction at the time.
Last edited by EE-BO; 08-02-2008 at 04:15 PM.
|