Thanks for the article CT4......
It really made me think but IMHO, that judge was a punk and straight sell-out for his ruling.
NIGGA is just as bad. And on what grounds/documentation is there that says that NIGGA is the user-friendly version? Just because it is used in the everyday language of some? Does that mean that if me and my friends use the word WETBAC or CRACKA
(no offense meant to anyone...this is being used for example purposes ONLY!!!!!) in my everyday conversations, that it is not a hate crime if I use it to deface someone's property and to demean them? I mean come on!!!!!
Let's call a spade a spade.
I think I will find out the San Jose judge that ruled on this case and send him a nice email. Maybe it will start off like this...
Dear Cracka..........
Do you think this will still be considered a hate letter since I spelled it differently?
Once again, I DO NOT use any of these words in my everyday language and I DO NOT look kindly upon those people that do. No matter how you dress it up you can't put syrup on chit and call them pancakes!!!