Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
Several GLOs (NIC, NPC, NPHC, and NALFO) that I've run into have been concerned because simple things incorporated into their programs have to be stopped/re-evaluated because they don't want to run into trouble with "well, that coooould be considered hazing" violations.
|
Right, but (following your lead) in my experience, that concern stems from the threat of civil liability, where the criminal definition given in state law wouldn't necessarily apply.