I had two thoughts while listening to the commentators.
1) The New Yorker just made a lot of money and
2) The people for whom this cover reinforced beliefs are in the exact same place they were before (not voting for him and not liking him) and those people who support his efforts (whether or not they're voting for him) are still in the same place. How did the cover change anything for anyone except to bring attention to the New Yorker?
I do believe that the person who drew it as it is rather than as a thought bubble or some other way might have been projecting insecurities, but I'm not a psychologist.
__________________
ONE LOVE, For All My Life
Talented, tested, tenacious, and true...
A woman of diversity through and through.
|