Quote:
Originally Posted by Army Wife'79
Madmax, those interviews were on April 30, 4 months after the death. I just think that if it was a poor person's dead child, they would have been split up and interviewed immediately.
|
I understand what you are saying and was bewildered by it myself in the past, but knowing what we know now, the police were apparently eager to blame the Ramseys even though they were not guilty. And it seems to be the police who blew the initial investigation rather than the Ramseys.
And I suspect the Ramsey's being a whole lot closer to the situation than we are could see how the wind was blowing a lot earlier than the rest of us in terms of what investigators seemed to be looking for.
I'm not trying to assert that the police weren't behaving in a customary and statistically valid method of looking at the case. But if you knew you and your family weren't involved in the crime, how long would you indulge the police? Sure, we can say it was an investigation to "clear them" but it must not have felt that way to the family.