Does anyone else support or know about this mischevious brother's actions? Does anyone else fear the future of your chapter if he were in office?
I like Jame's suggestion about supporting the right person for the job and only speaking positively. However it IS your chapter's future at stake and with that comes the responsibility to speak out when necessary.
I don't know how your fraternity runs its elections, but perhaps each candidate should be spoken about in turn and leave the room until the conversation is done? Then things could be out in the open, but understood to be in confidentiality!
Just an idea.
Hootie