Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
I wasn't implying PhiGam's intention...I said it...go back and read what he initially posted...he implied that her promotion was political. And by that implication itself, he demeans what she was awarded especially in absence of evidence to support his 'theory'.
|
No. No he doesn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
Go back....read...read carefully...it's really not that hard to see.
And I will also request that you do the same thing...don't just read the initial post, please read the entire story.
|
Stop this - this isn't an argument, it's pretty much ad hominem, and it's message board trash (you'd never tell that to me in a face-to-face discussion, because it doesn't make sense - well guess what, it doesn't here either). Explain why it's demeaning. Assume I'm smart here, and that I disagree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
Women will be proud of this accomplishment and one man should not take away from it.
|
No man did.
It's OK to be skeptical - it's not mutually exclusive to think that the woman is both highly qualified, and that the "powers that be" utilized her qualification for political gain. One does not invalidate the other.