View Single Post
  #4  
Old 06-19-2008, 04:54 PM
PeppyGPhiB PeppyGPhiB is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1856 View Post
WSJ, Washington Post and LA Times ran story today:
Protest of Air Force tanker contract award to Northrop upheld

Air Force Faulted Over Handling Of Tanker Deal

Audit Sustains Boeing's Protest of $40 Billion Award
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...=moreheadlines

The Washington Post story is especially damning of the Air Force. They failed, possibly intentionally since one of the allegations is that they misled and supplied incomplete info. to Boeing, to follow their own RFP!!! If you follow the RFP, Boeing didn't deliver the wrong plane - EADS/NG did. Yes, the EADS plane was bigger, but that's the problem - the AF wanted a small enough plane that could fit in its current hangars, take off and land on its current runways. So Boeing submitted a model based on its 767 while EADS submitted a plane that was so big it couldn't even fit in some of the AF's hangars or land on some of its runways, which means the AF would've had to build new hangars and runways. Those restrictions were included in the RFP, and instead of docking points from EADS/NG's proposal, they gave them extra credit!

In my opinion part of the reason for the dismissals at the AF last week was because someone at the GAO gave TPTB a heads up of this verdict. The senior procurement chick's head is gonna roll, I think.
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
Reply With Quote