|
I saw some show on National Geographic about why the astronomers de-planeted Pluto. They said the "definition of what a planet is" was not changed since like 16th century. Pluto does not have essential properities--I think rotational axis about itself, no amount of true planet core as measured when Pluto is closest to the Sun and it's rotation around the Sun is not quite consistent...
I thought it was interesting as to why they "de-planeted" Pluto. Yeah, it sucks. But if there were to be some kind of "standardization" of our "heavenly bodies" based on modern consistent relevant data...
__________________
We thank and pledge Alpha Kappa Alpha to remember...
"I'm watching with a new service that translates 'stupid-to-English'" ~ @Shoq of ShoqValue.com 1 of my Tweeple
"Yo soy una mujer negra" ~Zoe Saldana
|