Quote:
Originally Posted by sigmadiva
From the genomics point of view, there is no benefit to the species to maintain a same sex relationship.
Like I've said this 15 pages ago......  |
Does it benefit the species when a retarded child is born? What should we do with people who are sterile?
I see where you are going with your argument, but for the central basis of what is good for the species is to be the rule of the day- then what about the many non-gay people out there who are unable to benefit the future of our species?
And what does that argument imply should be done? It is not just a matter of using this argument to say gays should not get married- I would think the ultimate resolution of this viewpoint is that society should bear no financial burden for anyone who is unable to reproduce or who could pass on genetic faults to children.
Maybe I am reading this wrong- but if the whole point is that it is unnatural for people to not reproduce for the benefit of the species, then a whole lot of people beyond the world of homosexuality fall under that umbrella of "unnatural."
And if they are unnatural, what is to be done with them?