Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephant Walk
All that true.
The only way you can compare chapter to chapter in my opinion, are things that have nothing to do with perception on campus. Doing it in numbers. Size, quality of members, size of the house, etc.
|
I think we're saying the same thing; could be wrong. Once the numnbers, house, quality, etc are established, then perception follows. Perception lags behind a few years, so some are actulaly better than their public image and vice-versa. However, the fraternities with the most enduring perceived strengths are the one assumed to be on top.
If, on the other hand, you're saying that you can't fairly compare a top chapter on one campus to a top chapter on another, you are absolutely correct.