View Single Post
  #4  
Old 03-05-2002, 02:12 PM
SweetestDiva SweetestDiva is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: What you know about them Texas girls?? :)
Posts: 763
Re: Re: Ummmmmm

Quote:
Originally posted by strobelitehoney


Don't get mad at me cause I said, what others were thinking.


I KNOW I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT HAS THOUGHT THAT. TAKEN THE FACT THAT, SHE DIDN'T INVITE HER OWN DAMN MOM TO THE WEDDING, IS RIDICULOUS. WHO WOULDN'T WANT THEIR MOM THAT HAS BEEN THERE FOR THEM FROM THE VERY BEGINNING AT THEIR OWN WEDDING. So how family oriented is that being.
ALL OF THIS WAS SAID ON THE RADIO THIS MORNING. THAT CAME FROM THE SAME MAGAZINE ARTICLE, THAT LIL-SUNSHINE WAS TALKING ABOUT.
1. How do you know for sure what others were thinking? Obviously a lot of "others" weren't thinking the same thing (i.e. myself, CT4, TickledPink). Yes, you're entitled to your own opinion, but don't justify hating by saying you were just speaking on behalf of "others" who didn't speak up themselves.

2. How do you know the details of her wedding? Because a magazine or radio personality says it, does that make it true? Were you there? Did Brandy tell you who she did or didn't invite? And since you're the one that has been bashing Mrs. Norwood from the beginning about her involvement in Brandy's life, could you maybe see why she didn't invite her, IF that was the case? How all of a sudden is it a shame how she treats her "own damn mom" when almost every post you've made thus far has been downing the same mother for being in her child's business?

I'm not asking these questions to be rude. I just wanted to give some examples of how petty these things are. Talking about someone's appearance is one thing (you can SEE FOR YOURSELF what they look like), but laying out what you HEARD about one's personal life and then criticizing and judging is another. You pose the question as to how family-oriented Brandy is. How 'bout this - How sisterly are we when we make assumptions like these?

Last edited by SweetestDiva; 03-05-2002 at 02:16 PM.
Reply With Quote