View Single Post
  #162  
Old 03-28-2008, 03:23 PM
tld221 tld221 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: only the best city in the world
Posts: 6,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSteven View Post
As I understand it, John Doe (the son that was skipped) would be able to pick up the tradition and name his son Jim Doe IV. The reason is that John Doe's son is the forth *Jim* Doe in the family.

And if John Doe decided to name his son John Doe after himself, then his son would be a junior/2nd. And for what it is worth, generally speaking "Junior" is used for a son within the same direct lineage, while 2nd/II is used when a generation is either skipped or it is not a direct lineage.

Here are a few possible scenarios that I am personally acquainted with either via my family and/or friends.

Scenario One - direct lineage
Generation 1: John Doe (farther)
Generation 2: John Doe, Junior (son of John Doe) ------ Frank Doe (brother of John Doe, Junior and son of John Doe)
Generation 3: John Doe, III (son of John Doe, Junior)
Generation 4: John Doe, IV (son of John Doe III)

Scenario Two - Son has no male offspring - indirect lineage
Generation 1: John Doe (farther)
Generation 2: John Doe, Junior (son of John Doe) [no sons] ------ Frank Doe (brother of John Doe, Junior and son of John Doe)
Generation 3: John Doe, III (son of Frank Doe)
Generation 4: John Doe, IV (son of John Doe, III)

Scenario Three - Name skips a generation, but also direct lineage (with a twist)
Generation 1: John Doe (farther)
Generation 2: Frank Doe (son of John Doe) [name skipped]
Generation 3: John Doe, II (son of Frank Doe) *and* Frank Doe, Junior (brother of John Doe II, son of Frank Doe)
Generation 4: John Doe, III (son of John Doe II and cousin of Frank Doe, III) *and* Frank Doe, III (son of Frank Doe, Junior and cousin of John Doe, III)
OK i suppose this makes sense...

and now to take the thread even more off-course:

Quote:
Teenager in Anheuser-Busch family accused of underage drinking
NEWS WIRE SERVICES
Friday, March 28th 2008, 4:00 AM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_w...accused-1.html

GODFREY, Ill. - A teenage descendant of the beer-making Anheuser-Busch family has been accused of underage drinking.

Adolphus August Busch 5th, age 17, was arrested with eight other teens at a party Wednesday night. Busch is the grandson of the late August Busch Jr.

"Neither this individual, nor his parents, are employees of Anheuser-Busch. This company, therefore, has no involvement in this matter," said a spokesman for the company, which makes Budweiser and Michelob.

Investigators say the teens were drinking Natural Light - an Anheuser-Busch product - and rum and cokes.

Busch is free on $100 bond.
from Busch Jr to Busch 5th, that's one too many generations from grandfather to grandson. what happened?

and really, do i need to state the obvious on this story?
__________________
Do you know people? Have you interacted with them? Because this is pretty standard no-brainer stuff. -33girl
Reply With Quote