[h2oot]

KSigRC said: Don't roll the guy like this - you can't play both sides. You deny the antecedent, then pop off something completely analogous and assert it as true - and then you wonder why he's frustrated? I'm not particularly sympathetic to this sort of editorialization on your part.

I presumed much of his characterization was taunting in jest, so my reply at that level was simply a toss-back and was appropriate. Am sorry you missed the point. Next time I'll footnote it for you.

KSigRC also says: Now, whether or not this is a valid generalization on his part is another argument - but it's subjective, and so perception quickly becomes reality, right?

Yep, it may be his reality, but since he's seeking opinions, I presume he wants to change that perception...ergo, my reply.