Actually, you can tell a lot about a person by their writing. Whether it is on-line, or in a college paper, you reveal yourself more than you know. It is true we have nothing to judge you on but your posts - but why would you argue that you are being attacked if you are called to account? Are you an active? Or an alum? With what chapter(s). It's a valid question, especially since you are so free and easy with your expertise? You are the one who set yourself up as an expert, going so far as to criticize others who have offered advice you disagree with. Sorry my use of irony went straight over your head. Some of us are having a chuckle at your expense right now.
Some of us are not playing roles - we will tell you our affiliation and our status. I am always suspect of those who won't - they must have something to hide. There are GCers I know irl, and those plus a few others are the only ones I worry about as far as their opinion. Again, you can tell a lot about a person by their posts, and I'm comfortable with the tone and content of mine.
OH NOES - I have no credibility with Elephant Walk! Someone, hold me as I sob.
Oh, and if you are going to quote Shakespeare, do it right.
eta - Okay, I don't want this to turn into a personal thread - so I'm bowing out, putting EW on ignore, and returning this thread to your regular programming.