Pain3_97
My Soror was talking about our Sorority, not PBS, so that is why you never heard of the rule...
PrettyKitty,
As far as who was the first to brand, I actually had been told that the Ques were the first ones (although I won't swear by this since I am not a Que). However, it has nothing to do with Omega versus Q-dog....every brand I have seen has been of the Greek letter Omega (with some variations), but I have NEVER seen a brand of a dog, so you can't use the terminology to date the origins of branding.
SOPHISTICATED1,
Hope this answers your question....
Quote:
Originally posted by Pain3_97:
This is in reference to the comment made by dstbrat. You mentioned a scenario that if one of you members were arrested and their mugshot showed their brand or tatoo. What would be the difference if they were wearing a T-shirt or a charm? I personally have three brands and I don't regret either one. I have never heard of a policy that says anything about branding or tatooing (voluntarily) is against the rules. To me it shows a since of pride. A brand is going to stay with you for the rest of your life, showing your true love for your organization. I am not saying that you have to have one to love your org. but it d**n shows others how much you care. Blue Phi til the day I die.
|