Quote:
Originally Posted by cheerfulgreek
No one said the the research that was done is accurate. Most of what I posted is based on my opinion. I was just backing it up with scientific information.
No one really knows the answer, but a growing body of evidence suggest that testosterone is as much the result of violence as its cause. I mean, both winning a sporting match and beating an opponent at chess can boost testoterone levels. Just like losing a sporting match, growing old and becoming obese, all reduce levels of testosterone.
Also changes in testosterone levels in response to challenges can be further shaped by our own expectations. There has also been a study that was done, that said actors, blue collar workers and con artist tend to have higher levels of testoterone than clerks, intellectuals and administrators. So it's not just athletes. I just mentioned football players because of my own experiences with them. It's even been suggested that the antisocial behaviors related to high testosterone are a function of the manner by which dominance is maintained in these groups.
I dunno, lets say if researchers were to study other groups of people, like the rich and famous, they might discover that testosterone is connected not to violence, but to the person who drives the biggest SUV, or has the nicest house. Who knows?
There's also evidence in humans that, just as in animals, testosterone is responsive to male-male competition. Back to when I was comparing actors and blue collar workers, to clerks and administrators, I'm not sure whether this correlation was the cause or an effect of the environment in which these individuals found themselves. Back to what I stated about prisons, are high testosterone males more likely to become violent criminals, or does being a violent criminal raise a guy's level of testosterone?
I think in this case, both do. srmom, my opinion differs from yours because based on your posts you live with athletes and haven't had a problem with them. I haven't had any problems from all athletes, just football players, and this goes back to what I said about the different changes in testoterone levels. I believe it's higher in more aggressive sports, or more aggressive activity which may be why a lot of football players are violent, and why Chris Benoit killed his family. None if this is 100% true, that's why we have opinions.
If you're mad at me for whatever reason, I apologize if I offended you, but I still think high testosterone males are more likely to practice dominance, which can turn into violence.
|
Oh Gosh. It is so annoying when people walk on egg shells like this.
Personal opinions that are not based on more than a loosely qualitative observation of a limited sample size don't truly challenge these findings. That's why it suffices to just say "correlation is not causation," as I said in my previous post.
Opinions aside, research has found a relationship between aggression, violence, competitiveness, and testosterone, in general, and athletics more specifically (and not just male dominated athletics). This research has been conducted on animals just as some has been conducted on humans, as you said.
Such findings have also been found to loosely apply to nonsports but all of this is a "nature vs. nurture" kind of thing. This society has certain gender expectations that allow males certain freedoms and behaviors that people assume are "natural," so testesterone level may have a weaker effect than gendered socialization does. The research that tends to disagree with the impact of testosterone is based on a "nature vs. nature" distinction and which has a greater impact. But the most credible research will control for both gendered socialization and hormone level.
When we talk about a relationship between gender, testosterone, and aggression, it doesn't have to manifest itself in obvious and everday interactions. It can be limited to athletic competitveness or manifest itself somewhere else that isn't so obvious. It's easy to overlook this stuff if you aren't consciously observing it or (trained to even) reflect on what you have unconsciously observed.