Quote:
Originally Posted by SWTXBelle
At some campuses, the BGLO are so strong that there is not much, if any, interest in minorities in pursuing membership in a traditionally white GLO. If you look at composites, they might be lily white, and you might assume they are racists.
|
I don't think anyone should assume racism because a chapter is "lily white." The absence of something doesn't equal racism unless certain practices are found that attempt to deter nonwhites from participating in chapters' events or going through recruitment.
And, yes, every fraternity and sorority has chapters that go out of their way to keep certain people (whether that's based on race, social class, hair color, etc.) from programs or recruitment activities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWTXBelle
I'm reminded of when cries of "Racism!" were leveled against the SMU Panhellenic. Turns out, no minorities(specifically, blacks) had gone through recruitment. (!!!) Once some did, some did indeed receive bids.
|
Makes sense. But, keep in mind that this still goes back to the many factors that contribute to why some minorities do not go through recruitment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWTXBelle
There are so many variables to why someone might not be given a bid. In fact, a very non-racist member might chose NOT to give a minority a bid if they felt their brothers would not be as accepting or positive about his pledgeship. Be very careful of making gross generalizations.
|
So instead of questioning the status quo, these people go right along with it.
That's actually STILL racism at the individual-level and reinforces the racist structure.