Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
So, the natural question (at least to me) would be is hazing worth losing those guys who you at least thought were the kind of man you would like to call "brother."
When I look at our chapters (or any one elses) who pledge thirty guys and initiate fifteen, I think two things. First, that they probably haze and second, what a waste of time and resources to lose members of your pledge class that you've had to work hard to win.
It makes no sense to me.
But then, after being a alumni volunteer/officer, I can't condone hazing at all.
ETA, thinking of the title of this thread, it is kind of a stretch since, as has been pointed out, there weren't really "hazing laws" back then. If situations got bad enough, there could be prosecution under other laws, as has also been pointed out.
|
The thing is...many chapters pledge thirty guys with the intention being to only initiate 15. It's very common. I'm not saying it's right. I'm just saying that a lot of times losing half the guys is all part of the plan, so the actives do not see it as a loss.
Edit: Forgot to mention that just because they GOT 30 guys doesn't mean they worked hard (or at all) to get them. Some chapters are lucky enough to be able to sit back and let 150 years of history work it's magic.