Quote:
Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS
Your posts aren't "proving" what you think they are.
That national website quote is just acknowledging that "Latin" isn't a "race" but is rather a fusion of different cultures, nationalities, races, colors, creeds, and religions. Everyone should know this already.
It doesn't negate the Latin roots or that you all are a Latin Sorority. So I really don't get why you're all over this board trying to refute something that isn't really refutable.
And Latinos are not "taking over America." They are still a minority group both in size and influence because they aren't even close to the population and power of whites and have only surpassed blacks in population size over the past 2 or so years.
|
I would never ever want to negate the latin roots of my organization, so please do not think that because I am a non-latina, that I would want to do that.
that quote was also about "all women" so unless "all women" are latinas, then I don't see why I didn't prove my point.
yes, i know latinos are not taking over america, but ch2tf was insinuating being both minorities and latinos is a no-no, and that they are mutually exclusive of each other, (she says, and I quote "
You're confusing me here because you assign LTA as an LGLO and a minority GLO within the same paragraph.....So what is it, is LTA an LGLO, is it a minority GLO ")
all i was saying is that if you wanted to get technical, then no, Latinos are not minorities if you look at the fact that there are more latinos than anyone else, or call asians minorities since, technically, one out of every four people on this planet is chinese/indian...