View Single Post
  #2  
Old 12-27-2007, 10:57 AM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSUZeta View Post
but maybe your point was why have the furs in the movie in the first place, and that is a point well taken. i imagine that kim cattrall has enough star power to refuse to wear the furs without any negative outcome to her contract or paycheck.
Yes, that was exactly my point. Her taking a stand and not wearing them at all would make a lot more of an impression on young women than donating the coats to PETA.
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote