View Single Post
  #185  
Old 12-27-2007, 10:30 AM
33girl 33girl is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hotel Oceanview
Posts: 34,519
continuing the hijack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleur de Lis View Post
I read this and thought about this thread:

Kim Cattrall may wear fur in the movies, but she doesn't in real life.

I’m told Cattrall has made arrangements for PETA to receive the four white furs she wears in the upcoming Sex and the City movie.
If you're anti-fur, why would you wear real fur in a movie that's going to be seen by millions and will probably increase the cachet of fur with younger women? Plus, why does it make it any better that PETA will get the coats and gives them away - the animals are still dead! These aren't going to be old furs from Grandma's closet from before the days when people were more enlightened about all this - they're probably going to be custom made (and killed) for the film.

Sorry, but this is a subject that I get really hyper about (having owned a fur-bearing animal as a pet).
__________________
It is all 33girl's fault. ~DrPhil
Reply With Quote