Quote:
Originally Posted by amanda6035
|
Ok, I think that might be just a SLIGHT overreaction, don't you think? And seeing where the article is posted, I'd say "consider the source" would be applicable. This site is just ever-so-slightly biased.
I saw the mark-up of the bill (SB777), it basically adds "sexual orientation" to the current discriminatory protections already in place for every other kind of "categorized" group there is. There is no "teaching agenda" in the legislation.