[skylark]

ASSUMING the rumors that had circulated around Craigs sexuality for decades are in fact true (I think there is no question, based on the fact that the rumors come from completely independent sources) then I think that IF Craig had taken the opportunity to come out, saying something to the effect of how embarrassing it is that because of his position in the government he felt that he had to hide his true sexuality, that it would have been good for the gay rights political movement. I think it would have been positive because:

a) people in conservative religious regions of the US might realize that people they know and respect are gay (the stereotypical effeminate san francisco spandex wearing gay man is something that a lot of people still think of in communities where being openly gay is not an accepted lifestyle). Breaking down stereotypes is a very powerful thing.

b) it would be easier for future gay political candidates to seem more legitimate because Craig, who was all but untouchable as a successful politician in Idaho for decades, did a good job and proved that being gay doesn't necessarily mean you are anti-gun or any of the other things that republicans tend to stand for (besides being against gay rights).

c) individuals who are living in areas that are more conservative, like Idaho, might feel more comfortable coming out and talking about their sexuality if their senator had come out in a respectful way.

I realize I am being totally optimistic, but my comment was meant to be an optimistic reflection on how Craig could have turned this into a positive thing for America and lesbian/gay rights and, quite frankly, his own life, since now the questions and looks will always be there. (Assuming he is gay) wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop fighting the rumors and finally embrace who he is, even if initially it might be difficult for his family and loved ones? Arguably, his family and loved ones are probably going through worse right now because of all the questions and scrutiny.