Quote:
Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS
Right!
The school does have a point but it's really hard to maintain members at schools where they were struggling for members in the first place, the students there won't attend programs, etc. Sometimes the campus even takes it upon itself to decide it no longer wants the organization there (often not for liability reasons, either) and works towards that by refusing to let the group reserve rooms for programs and post informational fliers. Whenever there's a policy, there's a way to get shafted by it.
|
Believe me I'm aware of the plethora of ways that student orgs can get shafted. It's an interesting dilemma and not one that I see an easy solution to, except perhaps with schools that allow non-campus based orgs access... or something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS
LOL.
This is that superficial diversity initiative and quota bullcrap that I referenced earlier. If there is no genuine interest, don't bother. Because many NPHCers can tell the difference between nonNPHCers who sincerely want to work with us and nonNPHCers who are afraid their membership is at stake.
|
Honestly, I agree. I'm not aware of our chapter ever being required to have diversity quotas or diverse activity quotas or whatever. The reason I think it is something to be worked toward is because a lack of (constructive) contact with each other means there's a lot of ignorance. Greater contact = Greater knowledge/understanding. I think it would mean that NPC/IFC doesn't just see NPHC as good at stepping and NPHC wouldn't only see NPC/IFC social events.