Quote:
Originally Posted by Zillini
I agree with you to some extent. There are some campuses that have taken dress codes/guidelines to an extreme. It does perpetuate some of the negative stereotypes about sorority girls that are out there. Especially when it gets nitpicky.
However when it comes to Recruitment I think it's a good thing to give actives guidelines. Let's face it, this is the time a Chapter is supposed to be presenting itself in the best possible light. On a large competitive Recruitment campus during 1st round PNM's have 15-20 minutes to decide if they like ABC or not. Often those first conversations are identical from Chapter to Chapter. "Hi! What's your name? Where are you from? What's your major? How do like your dorm/room mate? etc" So one of the factors PNM's use to form their opinions is how the actives looked.
We don't go to the extreme of saying only a size 4 is allowed to wear _____, but we do dress check every outfit the actives plan to wear. In the spring we lay out guidelines for the actives so when they shop during the summer they'll keep these things in mind. Mostly it's for uniformity, but there are some wearability and style issues we address.
Some examples, on Philanthropy Day the actives wear shorts. We don't want any Daisy Dukes, so they are to look for mid-thigh length or longer. During most of the parties PNM's sit on chairs while the actives are kneeling on the floor. We don't want anything too low cut because I doubt the PNM's would appreciate a mega-cleavage view. (If the PNM's were guys that would be a whole other story.   ) Because the actives are constantly standing and kneeling, anything that's too tight might ride up or even rip.
Then there's my personal pet peeve -- strapless dresses. Yes, yes, I know they're hugely fashionable now and have been for the last several years. But IMHO there is nothing more unattractive than seeing a group of young women, all dressed up and looking lovely, then constantly pulling up their tops. Every year I watch the parade of PNM's enter the house and I swear every one who's wearing strapless is yanking on it.  |
Oh, I understand completely but my colleague sees it only has a validation of her negative view of sororities, despite the fact that without dress/appearance guidelines for recruitment at an SEC chapter, her daughter's group probably would stand out in a negative way since all aspects of rush are traditionally really well planned out.
(To be honest, I just doubt the size four rule was ever even really stated as a policy. I think maybe in the course of dress check it worked out that way because normal sized people didn't look that great in whatever it was. But even so, in a process in which appearance matters like SEC recruitment, don't take it all personally if the chapter thinks you look better in something else. It's not like they've limited your participation in recruitment; they've just saved you from not looking your best.)