|
The reason candidates try and raise alot of money early on is because they want to "scare" other potential candidates from running. The media profits from this mad dash for cash (where do you think the money goes?!) so they want the electorate to believe that whoever raises the most amount of money wins.
The title of this thread buys into this hype...since they've raised the most amount of money why would anyone presume that either one of them would be the Democratic nominee? (
Clinton is a socialist and Obama doesn't have any goverance experience (if had been the governor of Illinois, he'd be much more prepared, historically, how many Senators have been president?) Bill Richardson would be a more formidable presidential candidate because he's more qualfied.
|