Quote:
Originally posted by CkretCrush8
To give another opinion....I agree with what everyone has said thus far; however, I do believe that a child's way of living should remain the same. Why should she suffer because of the divorce of her parents, especially if it was arranged. He said himself that he would supply for all of her needs. If my natural father was able to do exceedingly and abudantly above all that I can ever ask for, I'm sure my mother would have done the exact same thing; however he is not in the position. Mr. Kirk is in the position to support his daughter. He isn't upset at the amount that Lisa is requesting, but the fact that she went public with her case. The child involved in any divorce case, should always benifit off of the "wealthier" parent, in my opinion.
|
I agree. He had no problem kicking out this money before. Its well documented that he was spending this. Its also not like he was only dating the women for a few months. We are talking 10 years. If you give someone 10 years of your life, what do you think you deserve. She probably was working those 10 years because she was most likely taking on the wife role at home. We are also assuming that she wants it for her, if that was the case why would she agree to not ask for spousal support if they split. Hell you don't even have to be married to get spousal support its called palimony. Why shouldn't her child be comfortable and set for the rest of his or her life.