http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/11/pat...ses/index.html
this is not the first time i have seen this happen...This Fl man owes 10k for a child that is not his. even the paternity test proves he is not the father, but the courts are insisting he pay since he missed a deadline to contest it.
what do you all think? is it fair to make a man pay child support for a child who is not biologically his, assuming he has not adopted the child or any other odd circumstances...