Mutilation does not equal sex change
I take an opposite attitude. In a traditionalist interpretation, the member has merely maimed himself. Despite the claims perhaps now allowed in the legal system, fraternities holding principles rooted in orthodox religious observance could simply ignore the surgery as a mutilation - no different than if the same effects were due an accident. The state can claim the physical change makes a different sex but a fraternity need not accept the alteration as a real change in sex identity.
BTW, some fraternities allow resignation from membership. Mine does not.
__________________
Alpha Alpha Alumnus
Kappa Alpha Order at
The University of the South
"Following Lee since 1883"
|