View Single Post
  #1  
Old 06-14-2007, 12:21 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25 View Post
I didn't really even think about the fact that it was a pretty low year for voter turnout.
Unfortunately, that's the problem. It wasn't a low year for voter turnout, at least comparitively speaking. Nationally, voter turnout has hovered in the 50%-55% range in every presidential election since at least 1980.

Quote:
Originally Posted by macallan25
I do agree with RC though, excellent post.
I agree. And where RC says: "there is no reason to think the non-voting population is distributed differently from the voting population, is there?", I would say that one could reasonably guess that the distribution of Bush supporters might be higher among the non-voting population compared to the voting population. One could reasonably speculate that the reason some of these lazy bums didn't vote is because they were relatively satisfied with the status quo -- in this case, Bush -- and weren't as motivated as those who wanted to throw Bush out.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote