Quote:
Originally Posted by exlurker
Well said, KappaKittyCat. You touched on a reality that sometimes gets forgotten: every NPC and NIC group has some chapters that are "top" on their campuses, and others that are very different from the "top" ones. Sometimes it's easy to think too locally about Greek life.
Even with alum hindsight and experience, I occasionally have to surpress a "whaaaat?" reaction to some GC posts. There still can be a sudden jolt when news of recruitment difficulties (low numbers, hard to make quota / compete) or serious trouble with the law is posted, and the GLO(s) in question are ones that are "top" house or milk-and-cookies / straitlaced ones at my campus or at the university in my home town.
|
This is the problem with this video. Yes, there are groups out there who focus entirely too much on which girls will make the "hottest" pledge class, but I think it's disrespectful to the entire system to say that this goes on everywhere. It is a superficial process, but it's superficial on both sides. If the girls coming to rush weren't thinking about being in only the "top" sorority on campus (i.e. Ole Miss,) then we wouldn't have this obsession. Unfortunately, no one has been able to come up with a better solution. I think explaining the ins and outs of rush to a rushee may make them feel better, but in the end will it change the outcome? Probably not since the most important part of membership selection is private and secretive. At many chapters, including mine, we were simply trying our best to get to know the girls in a short period of time. How about highlighting the pressures on a chapter that force them to make quick, unenlightened decisions? Can you really blame a group for adapting to the circumstances?