Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrely girl
i can see what you're saying here but i also don't believe that ALL hedonists would be trendy. maybe there's just a separate category for trendy...
other than that can i go with 1.5?
|
True, I don't think all people who fit in that "hedonist" category are trendy, just that they're separating sex and pleasure from emotional attachment. They may only be attracted to men (or women) but they don't care who they bump uglies with. It's not exactly an official category, just one that seems to fit. Oh, and Cosmo UK just did an article about LUGs and also brought up the term heteroflexible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bichonelle
I'm a 1.5
There are a few topics for Drolefille's class. I agree that violence in lesbian relationships is very undereported.
I'm curious to know the correlation between lesbian nuns and violence within their convents, communities, and schools. Wonder if they've done studies. I've heard awful stories, but nothing documented.
(FYI, I'm Catholic, I'm marrying a Catholic in a Catholic ceremony. I am not bashing the church. I just think it's an underreported subtopic.)
Let us know how the class goes, Drolefille.
|
Thanks! We had a special presentation on Transgender/sexual issues Tuesday and I'm loving the class. I agree that there's an underreported issue of lesbian and gay activities and violence within the Church. How much, I'm not so sure. It's hard to tell. I'll look into it
Quote:
Originally Posted by neosoul
LGBT DV is very real... and SO underreported...
|
Yeah, I really really wish I had more than an hour for my presentation as I have to cover so much (or at least I want to) and I hate presentations so that should tell you something
