View Single Post
  #14  
Old 05-22-2007, 04:23 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 18,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid View Post
Wouldn't it be standard of care for the type of medicine, not necessarily for the type of facility? We talked about this quite a bit in class, about the standard of care being somewhat fixed. That may be more CT tort law though, so I could be wrong.
Torts was so long ago

Whatever the standard of care is will usually be defined by whatever your local legislature, in its wisdom has decided that it is. I'm pretty sure you're right -- the locality rule wouldn't really talk about the type of facility, just the type of medicine. Still though, the standard of care in an overloaded emergency hospital in the worst part of town under the locality rule would be different than say the Yale-New Haven Hospital unless you were one of those national standard folks.

Then, the standard would still have to be established by expert testimony.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
Reply With Quote