|
Ok, So how is posing for Playboy and losing one's membership any different than a collegian getting an acting job which requires partial or full nudity. They film this movie on their summer break. Its released in the fall. They return to school. Everyone sees them naked in the film.
But... they have now also acheived a degree of main stream celebrity...
So...
Is nudity in "mainstream" celebrity ie: movies, television, theatre (ie" the blue room) MORE acceptable to a GLO than nudity in more "devient" forms such as Playboy, et al?
And really, how do they differ? They don't.
Playboy requires nudity.
So did the member's acting job.
Both are art.
Both are going to be "rated" R.
How is it different? Is it differnet? Why should some members be held to one standard while others are held to different ones simply because its better publicity?
|