Why did this have to get so contentious?
Kevin didn't claim to speak for all groups or claim to speak about formal relationships existing, as near as I can tell.
Everyone had a chance to explain what he or she knew to give a complete sense of the picture, which seems to be: although no official national relationships exist and are discouraged by NPC, some groups have historic or campus level bonds.
Couldn't it have been more polite?
ETA: Some topics themselves ARE controversial and people may be very passionate about them; I can see why people get snappy in some threads. It's just really weird that this one brought out.
Last edited by UGAalum94; 03-22-2007 at 01:38 PM.
|