|
I do think that the people who are the judge/juries/jailers on the whole hazing deal are waaayyy too sensitive. It's to the point where you cannot get into a verbal altercation over personal issues with a pledge or else it's considered "verbal harrassment/psychic trauma/blah blah blah." Pledges, excuse me, new members, who don't want to go to pledge meetings cry "Well, it's interferring with our academics!" Guess what? That's hazing!
Most of these hazing laws etc.... are a great thing! I don't want to be forced to drink, have sleepless nights, be humiliated! However, I think that because they are being so general with the definitions of hazing, the pledges are the ones that rule the house, not the actives.
|