|
I don't think it was a bad decision. It's clearly not against Fraternity policy, unless I'm mistaken.
It's their chapter, who are you or any of us to criticize their decision making? They're grown men. Unless those specific men were involved in an "incident", then I don't really care what the background or story is. It simply doesn't matter.
I really don't like the fact that a current chapter and brotherhood is limited in any capacity because of something some brothers did in the past. So the chapter had an incident 10 or 20 years ago. Tell me exactly how that should effect the brothers of present?
I'm a very outspoken member, but I would never come on here and criticize another chapter for making a legal decision within the boundaries of our international fraternity law. It's called autonomy.
|