Quote:
Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24
I agree! I dont get the wanting to sell cloned meat deal. I agree that it would seem more expensive to produce than breeding. I guess I just dont understand why they think it's necessary to do that.
As far as prescription drugs go that is so true! There are probably a few dangerous ones that have slipped through the cracks over the years but for the most part I believe they are safe (if used as directed) when they come out. There is no such thing as a completely safe drug, not even something as seemingly simple and common as Tylenol. It's the consumer/patient that neglects to follow dosing instructions and/or health care providers that neglect to look at the list of medications the patient is currently taking before putting them on the latest drug (which can cause adverse reactions such as Viagra and hypertension medications for example) AND neglecting to do a complete history and physical to rule out certain medical conditions that would make the medication contraindicated for that patient. But having said that a list of medications and medical history at least from the subjective information end are only as good as what the patient tells you.
As far as Vioxx being pulled.....most drugs tend to be pulled when law suits are filed against them regardless of why the law suits are filed.
|
Found some of the "why"
WSJ article reprinted here:
Cloned meat
Quote:
Cloning, or producing an identical copy of an animal using the genetic material of the original, would give farmers a way to upgrade their livestock herds by replicating their prized animals, preserving valuable traits such as high meat or milk production capacity, fertility or disease resistance.
That could be a boon to the livestock industry, which so far has largely missed out on the biotechnology revolution that swept through crops a decade ago. Meat packers, for example, might prefer to buy the offspring of a cloned pig with loins the perfect size for making pork chops or cattle with just the right amount of fat in the steak. Improved, consistent quality, in turn, could boost consumer demand.
|
Basically they're saying that they (the FDA) knows that currently it isn't cost effective but that's not their business. And that most likely cloned animals would be bred, not served, and we'd be eating the offspring. And in the end it's not much different than the artificial insemination that is already done.