Quote:
Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin
Under that logic, most people who sue for sexual harassment aren't entitled to cash either. Not something I agree with.
|
A big difference being that the hecklers were harrassing Richards first... whereas, sexual harrassment suits are (theoretically) brought about by totally innocent parties.
Sure Richards was wrong, and owed his audience and apology, but the hecklers owe Richards an apology as well for disrupting his act. How can they sue when they were at fault as well?