View Single Post
  #1  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:07 PM
kstar kstar is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: University of Oklahoma, Noman, Oklahoma
Posts: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiKA2001 View Post
So is he looking back and telling people how he should have killed ron & nicole. maybe try to cover up some of the overwhelming evidence that pointed straight to him? He shouldn't have worn his bruno mali shoes and he shouldn't have dropped his glove. what is he trying to prove? anybody with any kind of sense knows he killed those two. And what about his kids? I feel so bad for them, it's bad enough their father killed their mom, but know dad has to write a book about it...come on.

His glove? It didn't even fit! And the problem with the Simpson trial was that there was NOT "overwhelming evidence that pointed straight to him," most of the evidence that supported him as the killer was circumstancial at best.

I don't think the guy is totally innocent, but then again, I don't think the prosecutors should have gone to trial without good evidence.
Reply With Quote