Quote:
Originally Posted by RACooper
The "historical" Athur would have been a king from around 480 - 520; at least going from the battles and placenames mentioned in the earliest manuscripts.
Incidentally the 1200's is the beginning of the "Late Middle Ages"... really latest 'image' of Arthur from legend and even Hollywood.
|
a) my memory sucks, thank you
I just took a random stab at it... please forgive
and just because Arthur is IN their names, they won't be "King Arthur" They may not even be King William or Charles..