Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
No one wants to kick it with a disease bag, but honestly the term "freak" doesn't have negative connotation for me - in fact, I think most people want to be with someone who is sexually adventurous, knows what she wants, and is a sexual person.
Now, the average virgin is nowhere near these things - this is not an indictment of virginity; far be it from me to do anything of the like. However, the average virgin simply is not comfortable enough with sex or sexuality, in my (limited) experience, and requires a LOT of patience and 'coaching' (perhaps cajoling, perhaps simply communication - obviously YMMV). "Little experience", not surprisingly, does little to offset this barrier.
Does this mean I would never date a virgin? Of course not. Does this mean the sex with 'a freak' (versus a virgin or someone with little experience) would most likely be (much) better, especially at first? Obviously.
So, when we compare the two, AND ASSUMING ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP ARE EQUAL (I'm not going to give you that out), I would obviously prefer the person with whom the sexual aspect started on a much higher level. It just makes sense.
|
Dude, a freak? Man, I wouldn't get serious with a freak. I would get serious with a virgin though. A virgin generally is going to do what the more experience person likes to do. They know nothing else. A freak is going to want to do all kinds of things. Somethings I would never do.
Thats a different thread though.
But anyway, I like the basic woman. I would have a ton of patience with a virgin. But a freak? Hell no. I agree with you though, a freak doesn't mean she's a whore, I'm just saying 9 times out of 10 if she's doing that freaky stuff, she's obviously freaked several others before me. I'm not down with that. But to each his own.