Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rudey
Bubba-Cleetus, it's great that you can ignore the points I make because you can't address them and pepper in insults to help hide your inadequacies.
Again, nature hasn't needed people to come in and kill animals for many years before humans came into the same environment and it still doesn't in many of the ecosystems around the world where humans are scarce. But keep insulting me and sounding like a boob.
Good luck being a lawyer with your ambitions of getting into a fourth tier school. Of course if it doesn't work out you can be a park ranger as you are an expert on wildlife, you can become a pro hunter/fisher, you can ride donkeys on your "Ranch", or you can run your pops' lube company.
-Rudey
|
Your points are completely moronic. I'm not talking about ecosystems around the word.....and i'm not disagreeing with the fact that nature helped maintain animal populations long before humans occupied the land.
IF you knew anything about hunting, wetlands conservation, migratory bird fly-ways, maintaining leases, ranches, private land...you wouldn't make any of your idiotic dumbass statements. When you have 10,000 acres of enclosed land it is absolutely necessary to maintain the animal populations and closely supervise the wildlife. That is why we have wildlife biologists and game management periods.
Again, you haven't made any relavent points because you have no knowledge whatsoever of the subject you are trying to argue.
....and i'll be going to Texas .....so if the #15 ranked law school in the country is fourth tier....guess i'll just have to live with it.
I'd like to know why you don't condone hunting though.