Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Kd, well regarding the first paragraph, my question was mostly how the scientific community would view the thoughts and desires of the two groups. I don't think we should regulate how people think either, my question was solely concerning how the desires are viewed.
Regarding the injury part, I didn't mean I didnt understand HOW it actually worked, but more I don't know anything about sexual habits of gay couples. I don't know if they all generally participate in both oral and anal sex, or whatnot. Thus I didn't wanna say something and have someone go, "well, not all gay couples have that type of sex, etc..." However, don't you think those type of I guess anal related injuries would be more prevalent in a gay marriage. I doubt there are statistics on this, but I imagine people in a gay marriage are much more prone to participate in such an action. But then I'm from the south, so anal sex may be more common than not in other parts of the country.
|
I don't know how common anal sex injuries are. Being that you rarely hear about any kind of anal sex injury (besides the man in Seattle having sex with the horse, lol), I don't think it's prevalent enough to be much of an argument. Of course, you're free to provide some sort of stats or evidence to prove me wrong, but the frequency of occurrence of injury would be very minimal. And it would strongly pale in comparision to any injuries and health care associated with pregnancy and childbirth.
Sex acts know no geographical bounds, lol, so I really doubt anal sex is more common in certain parts of the country or not.